2020-01-11 12:14:37 UTC
A self-evident fake. "Same location" implies that gravitational waves don't move in a straight line to Earth but absurdly follow the path of (deflected) gamma rays:
Given the 2017 "same location" fake, any subsequent neutron-star-collision scenario involves an insoluble dilemma:
If "same location" is reconfirmed, LIGO conspirators will have to explain why gravitational waves coming straight to Earth somehow vanish in massive objects and only those strictly following the curvy path of the gamma rays gloriously reach LIGO's detectors. Hopeless business - the conclusion that LIGO conspirators fake gravitational waves will be more than obvious.
If "same location" is abandoned and gravitational waves and optical signals start coming from different directions, LIGO conspirators will have to explain how "same location" occurred in 2017 - again, the conclusion that gravitational waves are faked will be more than obvious.
As can be expected, the "same location" insoluble dilemma has been carefully avoided since the GW170817 fake:
"But one of LIGO's twin detectors was offline Thursday when the gravitational wave reached Earth, making it hard for astronomers to triangulate exactly where the signal was coming from. That sent astronomers racing to image as many galaxies as they could across a region covering one-quarter of the sky." http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2019/04/25/breaking-ligo-detects-another-neutron-star-merger/
"In this case, unlike many others, LIGO and Virgo were unable to significantly narrow down the direction in the sky that the waves came from. The researchers could say only that the waves were from a wide region that covers roughly one-quarter of the sky." https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01377-2
"You might wonder why we haven't seen knockout detections of electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational waves since the August 2017 discovery. Unfortunately, we probably just got lucky that time. “It was nearby, well-localized in space, and had everything going for it,” Berger said." https://gizmodo.com/mystery-deepens-around-newly-detected-ripples-in-space-1837581646
"The first such observation, which took place in August of 2017, made history for being the first time that both gravitational waves and light were detected from the same cosmic event. The April 25 merger, by contrast, did not result in any light being detected." https://phys.org/news/2020-01-ligo-virgo-gravitational-network-neutron-star.html
The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that space-time doesn't exist and neither do gravitational waves (ripples in space-time). At present LIGO conspirators look powerful, even invincible, but in the long run they are doomed:
"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory
"To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 2-17, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev