... Whatsoever along the theories the interrelationships between old and new
theories that quantum mechanics becomes Newtonian mechanics as b approaches
zero this limit corresponds to a situation in which the quantum wavelike
aspects of particles become negligible and this is why it cannot be
completely confident that newtonn's theories of motion and gravity used as
effectively in time as they are today whatever the ultimate theory of
everything is found to be would have a limiting form which describes
motionat speeds far less than that of light in weak gravity fields where
quantum wavelike features of mass are negligiblethis form will be the one
that Newton it wasthe same with quantum theories found provided more
complete description about the non-Newtonian with large objects they become
more like Newton's description of motion ...
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
"Pentcho Valev" kirjoitti
"Must we topple Einstein to let physics leap forward again?"
"Saving time: Physics killed it. Do we need it back? [...] Einstein landed
the fatal blow at the turn of the 20th century."
"Bye bye space-time: is it time to free physics from Einstein's legacy?"
Einstein managed to convince the gullible world that a nonsense he had
"borrowed" from the nonexistent ether - "the speed of light is constant" -
is a non-negotiable truth. The nonsense proved to be highly malignant - its
metastases permeated and eventually killed the whole field of science called
Albert Einstein: "...I introduced the principle of the constancy of the
velocity of light, which I borrowed from H. A. Lorentz's theory of the
stationary luminiferous ether..."
Brian Greene: What does it mean for the speed of light to be constant?
John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the
speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if
that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that
he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of
"The speaker Joao Magueijo, is a Reader in Theoretical Physics at Imperial
College, London and author of Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a
Scientific Speculation. He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of
relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and
that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of
that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern
physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than
swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
In the next version of fundamental physics Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom
"The speed of light is constant"
will be replaced with the correct axiom
"For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is constant".
I have developed the idea in a series of tweets here: